Context: In this scenario the incident tickets were reviewed by
the selected and trained reviewers with respect to a predefined
parameters.  The main objective is to
understand the accuracy as well as the consistency among the reviewers before
confirming the review results followed by appropriate actions.
v 
Reviewers, Checklist, Environment, Review method, Data
collection/capturing
Components
of MSA Process:
·  
Key Considerations:
§ 
The study should be performed over the range (Severities,
Shifts, Reviewers, Towers etc.,)
§ 
Actual Checklist should be used, already written review
procedures should be followed
§ 
It should be business as usual
§ 
Measurement variability should be presented “as-is”, not as it
was designed to be
·   Data Collection:
§ 
Select15 reviewers and 10 tickets to be evaluated
§ 
Appropriate sampling techniques should be used
§ 
Each ticket is to be reviewed 2 times by each reviewer with a
gap of sometime (e.g. a week)
§ 
Analyze the data to verify the repeatability, reproducibility
and accuracy
·   Frequency:
§ 
Once in a quarter
§ 
Addition of new reviewers in to the system
§ 
Changes to review checklists, Changes to the current process
being evaluated
§ 
Missing correlation with other sources like customer feedback
etc.,
 
